Training and responsible adoption

What we solve

We teach judgement rather than a collection of tricks: what each system can do, where it fails, which data must never be entered and which outputs need review before use.

Examples come from your business, not a generic syllabus. We include the EU AI Act context in practical form, without presenting training as legal advice or certification.

If you already have a task and an authorised tool, training provides practice in preparing and checking that work. If you still need to decide which process to address or who can authorise its use, clarify that first; the strategy service linked below helps define that first step.

Common problems

• The team already uses AI on its own, with no shared criteria
• Sensitive data gets pasted into unauthorised tools
• Outputs are used unverified and cause errors
• A system is about to be deployed and nobody knows how to use it well

An illustrative example

Proposed exercise with fictional notes: ‘Marta will review the draft. The delivery day is still to be confirmed.’ The task is to request an action list from those notes and check it before using it.

Review criterion: the list should contain the action ‘review the draft’, the owner ‘Marta’ and the deadline ‘unconfirmed’. The reviewer checks each field against the notes; a specific day would be added information that needs correcting.

To practise with another task, we retain the source, mark missing information and decide what needs human confirmation. This exercise requires neither recording meetings nor sending real customer documents.

An illustrative scenario explaining the service; not the outcome of a real customer nor a promise of results.

What the engagement includes

• A programme adapted to your team profiles
• Practical cases with your tools and tasks
• A written responsible-use and verification guide
• Authorised-tool and data criteria
• A Q&A session on the team's real situations

What we need from you

• For the first enquiry: team roles, starting level and tools the company authorises
• One specific task and the output you want to check, described with a fictional example; do not send customer data or confidential documents
• Protected time for sessions and practice
• Visible management support for the new criteria

Scope and costs

The programme is agreed in writing: profiles, sessions, remote format and materials included. We adapt its scope to the team's size and needs.

Training does not certify regulatory conformity or replace legal advice: it builds judgement and leaves evidence of the programme delivered.

Frequent questions

Is training online or in person?

We work remotely in Spanish, from Spain to all of Spain and Latin America. Sessions are live, with practice on your work.

Does it cover AI Act compliance?

It supports the AI literacy the regulation envisages, but a course alone does not demonstrate compliance with every obligation. We explain the limits clearly.

Does it suit very small teams?

Yes, they are our main audience. The programme adapts to two or three people as well as to a team of twenty.

What if my team is not technical?

Even better: the programme is designed for non-technical people. Responsible-use judgement matters more than prior knowledge.

How do we choose a useful first exercise?

We start with a bounded task the team knows and can check: for example, extracting actions from fictional notes. We agree on the authorised tool, source, expected format and reviewer. Team profiles and sessions are specified in the proposal.

How is an output checked during practice?

It is compared with the source: which facts it retains, which it adds and what is missing. In the notes example, an invented delivery day needs correcting. This check is part of the exercise; it guarantees neither the correctness of all future outputs nor permission to send them automatically.

Keep exploring

AI strategy and implementation ↗

AI agent platforms ↗

Prepare team criteria for AI use, review and updates↗

Scope depends on the process, data and existing systems. We assess feasibility, risk and applicable obligations before proposing a solution.